On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:28:09 -0700, jackbruce9999 wrote:
I would challenge you to prove that the term "DC sine wave" is
objectionable because it is fundamentally wrong as opposed to being at
odds with conventional terminology and nomenclature...

This is clearly a sucker bet. Anyone with common sense knows that
"conventional terminology and nomenclature" are already "fundamentally
wrong."

Notwithstanding there's no such thing as a "DC Sine Wave."

It's like saying, "I'd like some red paint, but in blue."

It's an oxymoron. (which I'd always thought was pimple cream for
retarded people).

"Since the sky is green, I guess I'll plant some bluegrass, and
paint my house clear."
--
Cheers!
Rich
------
"The notorious Duchess of Peels
Saw a fisherman fishing for eels.
Said she, "Would you mind?
Shove one up my behind.
I am anxious to know how it feels.""