Robatoy wrote:

In article ,
"DouginUtah" wrote:

[snipped for brevity]

I try to avoid posting off-topic subjects on the wRECk so, no more.

You're right. It is OT. But often the feedback in the wRECk is of a much
higher grade than the 'specialized' flamewars in other NG's.
I will bow out of this thread as well.

-Doug
(Robatoy--thanks for the link. It is always good to consider a different
point of view.)

I try to point out that there is a lot of ground between the two points
of view. Conserve on the fossil end, and get smarter on the nuke end.

And of course you're also planning to throttle down the Sun to just what we
need so that it doesn't run out of hydrogen sooner than it has to. Or is
that too long a time frame for you to be concerned about? And you
criticize others for thinking short term. Shame, shame.

--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)