"3ID64AR" wrote in message
oups.com...
I'm about to build a house and am trying to decide between a poured
wall all the way around or framing in 3/4 of the walls. I've convinced
myself that framing most of the basement would provide a more desirable
living area because I could put windows in the framed walls. I guess
the main questions I have is wondering if it would be cheaper to use
framing vs. concrete? thanks.

It all depends. Are you talking just framing the parts not in contact with
dirt, or are you talking those new-fangled treated-wood foundation systems?
If the latter, be aware that finding a contractor familiar with them may be
hard, and local inspector may not know what to do with them. But since you
said '3/4 of the walls', I assume you are speaking of a hillside house. In
that case, have your contractor estimate it out both ways. Full concrete is
easier on the framers, since they can lay first floor deck right on it, and
you don't have to make special provisions for catching centerline beam.
Framed is easier to finish on interior and exterior. Nothing is stopping you
from having windows in the poured walls, but it does make the pour and the
windows more expensive, and you have to make your choices real early in the
process. You may wanna also look at precast concrete foundations, which are
easier to finish out on inside, or those giant lego-style foam blocks that
you pour full of concrete, which provide a warmer and cozier and easier to
finish inside and out than raw concrete. Lots of options, depending on your
area and climate, and how much research your contractor is willing to put in
the process. Many shy away from doing anything strange to them, out of fear
of complaints and callbacks (and reduced profits, of course- anything
'wierd' adds time, and time is money.)

aem sends...