View Single Post
  #24   Report Post  
Andy Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 30 May 2005 12:46:58 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

Stefek Zaba wrote:

Mike wrote:

............................................ Seems somebody who doesn't
understand the problem has decided to save 3s&6d (to use and old
expression)
by ignoring that. I'll check it out.

In the best traditions of Usenet (ignoring your substantive, and hugely
worthwhile point) - wasn't it 3s4d? In the old expression/comms-garbling
tale - where the original message 'send reinforcements, we're going to
advance' gets passed back to HQ as 'send three-n-fourpence, we're going
to a dance'?

Or were you thinking of a different Old Expression?

Stefek



From a model airplane site I frequent...

"Hey mate, what frequency are you on?, I'm on channel sixty"
"I'm on sixty, too"

CRUNCH.

"Sorry, but you said you were on channel sixty-two"....



Don't you have a pegboard?




--

..andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl

The information contained in this post is copyright the
poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by
http://www.diybanter.com