In article , Gunner says...

You might not be able to see it, but his comments
about free speech are lockstep with Sarah Brady's
comments about gun ownership.

Please cite the relevant portions.

(quote)
so called,"antiwar demonstrators" who
exploit the right of _expression to chant anti-American obscenities.
(end quote)

and

(quote)
liberal media who abused freedom of the press
(end quote)

So basically what he's saying is, the first amendment only counts
when it agrees with his political views. It only counts when a
conservative exercises it, or when somebody voices a *pro*
american viewpoint.

The *real* heros (unlike this internet fraud) understand that
freedom sometimes means free speech for the Nazis in Skokie.

Exercise for the reader: compare and contrast this selective
approach to first amendement application, with Sarah Brady's
understanding that nobody should own guns. Except her and the
folks around her.

First amendment, for me and mine.
Second amendment, for me and mine.

But nobody else.

Jim


--
==================================================
please reply to:
JRR(zero) at pkmfgvm4 (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com
==================================================