On Mon, 09 May 2005 18:15:43 GMT, steamer wrote:

Gunner wrote:
: Korea will NOT be next. They are contained. They have about 20 nukes
: pointed at one of our strongest allies along with 10,000 or more
: artillery pieces zeroed in on Seoul.
--Iraq was "contained" too; look what happened there? 'Open a can
of worms', etc; you think the bumpkins in the WH would understand this,
but nooooooooooo...


Iraq was hardly contained. Care to discuss any N. Korean equivalent
of the Food for Oil program? No Fly Zone and 12 yrs of constant
firing on US and British aircraft? Is N. Korea a haven for
terrorists?

There is a very long list thatt belies your statements.

Your hatred of Bush and all things Conservative are noted time and
again, and how they taint your world view.


: Korea will be kept on the back burner for a long time, or until the
: management dies or is assassinated.
--Ideal case yes. Likely? Not so sure..

So..what do you think will happen? We going to send in the B-52s to
flatten various areas of N. Korea? And when a nuke detonates over
Seoul, Bush will commit sepuku..right?

Gunner

"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling
which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight,
nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being
free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
- John Stewart Mill