Ralph Hertle wrote:
wrote:
Ralph Hertle wrote:

:


The Constitution of the PRC, dated 1982, is posted at:


Oooo, 1982, over 20 years old. Do you have something more current,
like
the article I posted that talked about China's real property rights
amendments in 2004 and 2005?





Read the damned document.

What, losing your cool? I don't blame you.


The most recent amendment is dated:

"AMENDMENT FOURTH
(Approved on March 14, 2004, by the 10th NPC at its 2nd Session)".

Right, and this amendment included real properly rights. Read our own
congression report on this:

http://www.cecc.gov/pages/virtualAca...07710bf38272af






A mere 50 some years ago blacks didn't have civil rights in America
per
our constitution. Also, didn't our own constitution, with public
relations niceties stripped away, actually said only white men are
equal (not even women), and God gave us the rights to steal land
from
the Native Americans? (recalling the atrocities we committed with
constitutional authority, during Manifest Destiny period)




Actually, blacks have had rights ever since the beginnings of the
USA.

This is funyy. It is a fact Civil Rights law was pass in less than 50
years. If they had all the rights, why was it necessary to pass the
law.

Are you trying to tell me the slaves happily got on the ship, came here
and worked happily as equals? Who are you trying to kid? Even George
Washington owned slaves, Thomas Jefferson did what to his female slave?

Especially in the Northern States, where voting, property ownership,
marriage, schooling, free market employment were commonplace. Most of
the
issues regarding African-Americans were due to religion-based racism,
and
irrational fears by individuals. The Constitution was not supported
in the
defense of individual rights by those people. Fortunately, we are all
now
able to enjoy more liberty than before in that respect.

That has nothing to do with the current realities of the control of
the PRC
State over individuals. The PRC State has absolute power over the
individual, and that has been standard Marxist Socialist policy ever
since
the beginning of Soviet style Communism.

The State exercises total "lawful" control of the "rights" of
individuals.
"Rights" in the PRC are priveledges accorded by and controlled and
regulated by the State. They are not rights, the principles of which,
we
Americans agree or implicitly agree upon. We are free the individual
in the
PRC is merely accorded temporary arbitrary priveledges.

That has nothing whatsoever to do with the wrongs done in other
nations, or
the USA.

If you want to compare atrocities and deaths caused by the States of
the
PRC, or even the USSR, to similar problems in the USA,

Not only did we enslaved the Africans, we genocidally eliminated the
Native Americans. NA population only started to recover in the 1970's.
Go take a look.

you have to speak in
terms of mass killings on the order of many _tens of millions_ of
persons
by the Communists. Millions of Kulaks were wiped out by State imposed

starvation, just to name one example. The USSR put the Nazis to shame

insofar as mass killings, and PRC was many times worse, and more
ruthless,
than the USSR.

The numbers of wrongful deaths on the USA account would be small by
comparison, and probably in the order of hundreds during the same
time
period. There, for example, we are talking individual capital
punishments
by the State of Texas, and no mass killings.



Oh sure, our constitution have evolved - well so have theirs.




The PRC is indeed going to be changing.

Oh please, China's been changing for the better for the last 20 years.
Have you even been to China?


A civil war is one of the most dangerous possibilities that we can
foresee.

In the mean time the PRC is ripping off our technology, designs, and
patents at a furious pace, and our USA Administration is taking a
morally
passive view of all that.

The firms, e.g., Paslode, will have turned over the CAD files of its
factory, tooling, fixtures, and engineering and product designs to
the PRC
private label custom manufacturers. Copies of its business software
and
business model may have also been given away. Paslode may have
created its
own worst future business competitor, the PRC.

IBM's high speed computer hard disk drive manufacturing unit was
losing
money in spite of so called cheap Chinese labor. They were competing
against other Chinese sources. IBM's PC computer business was also
losing
money. Guess who owns those businesses now. The PRC. That's as pure
an
example of classic Marxist acquisition of western technology and
businesses
as can be given. That is pure skillfully executed Communist policy.


[clip to end of quotations]


Ralph Hertle