Cliff wrote:

On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 21:47:05 GMT, "Pete C."
wrote:

Cliff wrote:

snip


IF you were correct then clearly "terrorists" are of little
threat as it did not happen G.

Your theory assumes that the scenario has reached a conclusion. This
scenario has a time scale of years, not days or months.

How many more do you wish to murder & terrorize?

Pretty good way to make long term friends, eh?

Or are you thinking of gunner's loonie buddies with their
rants of taking over the government with a few flintlocks
if the "liberals" try to get them health care (probably in
fear of Lithium)?
--
Cliff

What relevance does that comment have to my comment about your flawed
reasoning terrorist attacks? You implied that since the US didn't
collapse after 911 that there was no threat of that from terrorist
attacks. Two attacks does not in any way indicate a conclusion, only a
beginning. It's also only a beginning locally since it has been going on
for years outside the US. The events in Spain clearly indicate the
dangers of an emotionally reactionary population.

Pete C.