On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 01:44:42 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:

"Gunner" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 22:46:12 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:


George, your posts are nothing BUT nonsense. Saying that the two Iraq
wars
were "one war" is about as stupid as anything you've said.

Your denial that the separation of the two periods of conflict was
only a cease fire... snip meaningless junk

Oh, Jesus, Gunner, you're losing it. Even the Bush administration makes it
clear that this latest war was (supposedly) about a threat to the US from
Iraq's "WMDs." The first one was about Iraq's first steps toward a takeover
of the Middle East.

Quit arguing for the sake of argument and get your stories straight for
once.

Like this one? (Snicker)

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0020912-1.html

" If the Iraqi regime wishes peace, it will immediately and
unconditionally forswear, disclose, and remove or destroy all weapons
of mass destruction, long-range missiles, and all related material.

If the Iraqi regime wishes peace, it will immediately end all support
for terrorism and act to suppress it, as all states are required to do
by U.N. Security Council resolutions.

If the Iraqi regime wishes peace, it will cease persecution of its
civilian population, including Shi'a, Sunnis, Kurds, Turkomans, and
others, again as required by Security Council resolutions.

If the Iraqi regime wishes peace, it will release or account for all
Gulf War personnel whose fate is still unknown. It will return the
remains of any who are deceased, return stolen property, accept
liability for losses resulting from the invasion of Kuwait, and fully
cooperate with international efforts to resolve these issues, as
required by Security Council resolutions.

If the Iraqi regime wishes peace, it will immediately end all illicit
trade outside the oil-for-food program. It will accept U.N.
administration of funds from that program, to ensure that the money is
used fairly and promptly for the benefit of the Iraqi people.

If all these steps are taken, it will signal a new openness and
accountability in Iraq. And it could open the prospect of the United
Nations helping to build a government that represents all Iraqis -- a
government based on respect for human rights, economic liberty, and
internationally supervised elections. "

Or this one?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0021007-8.html
Rule #35
"That which does not kill you,
has made a huge tactical error"