On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:13:16 GMT, (The Watcher)
wrote:

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:01:19 -0400, "Bob Brock" wrote:


"The Watcher" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 22:58:26 -0400, "Ed Huntress"

wrote:

Hmmm, maybe you should reword that, and waffle a bit. Surely there are
some
weasel words you could come up with that could obscure it a bit more so
that it
would look like they didn't REALLY vote "in favor" of anything. Maybe they
only
thought they were thinking of voting in favor of something. Yeah, that
could be
it. They were mislead by George Bush. Yeah, pass the buck. That'll work.
Blame
Bush.

Bush as the CNC of the military made the decision to invade Iraq. He made
it alone and he alone should take responsibility for his actions.

And NOBODY voted to give him the authority to do that, eh? So NOBODY else should
share in the responsibility for what Bush did, right? I guess if Bush has all
the power and takes all the blame, maybe we should just get rid of all those
other money-wasting jobs in Washington. We don't need them. Why pay them if we
don't need them? We could sure use that money somewhere else.

Nobody else set up a secret group to fabricate & tell lies &
propaganda, now did they?

IOW They KNEW that they were telling blatent lies.

http://tinyurl.com/bfmfy

As did the UN ... why do you think that they were afraid
of the UN?

Your "Bush & the neocons are too dumb" defense of their
lies & actions falls a bit short, does it not?

And, as it was based on lies and NOT on any sort of "self defense"
ALL of those that have so far died as a result or wil die in the
future are the result of mass murder & terrorism.

See what sort of fundie winger loons you lick?
--
Cliff