On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 01:08:49 +0100, "IMM" wrote:


"Andy Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 23:43:27 +0100, "IMM" wrote:


"Andy Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 22:26:24 +0100, "IMM" wrote:




CORGI? What can they do? They don't make the regs. They are a self
interest group.

True, but whether you like it or not, they are the body designated by
the HSE, who in turn are designated by law to which professional
fitters must belong.

I would remind you that your pugilistic pal wants to extend the same
concept across the entire construction and maintenance industry.

I don't like it either, and wrote to my MP about it. Twice. Why don't
you write to Raynsford about it, or his boss or even his boss's boss?

Do you think Thatcher is worth writing to.


These days, possibly not; although it may well be more effective even
now than writing to the hard of thinking in the ODPM.

One may not have agreed with the Baroness's actions, but at least
there was never any confusion over where she stood on important
issues.

Yep, always stood in the wrong place. The women was such a failure.


That depends on your perspective. Now then, about failures - you
have failed to comment on government over-legislation in the
construction industry. Do you have anything meaningful to say on the
subject, or are you going to continue with the same diversionary
tactics as ((jag++)++) and his cronies?



..andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl