On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:55:06 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:

"Gunner" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 01:25:43 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:

"Gunner" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:00:35 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:

o pay the Debts and provide for
the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States..."

Which part? General welfare?

All of it. That's Congress's authority, as set forth in the Constitution.

So all of them authorize National Endowment for the Arts?

All of what? What is it you're talking about? You're getting a little fuzzy.

Are you asking if the Congress has authority to authorize the National
Endowment for the Arts if they decide it's in the interest of furthering the
public welfare? The answer is, yes.

Public welfare is a crucifix in a jar of ****?

"**** Christ" falls under which category? Defense? General Welfare?

****ing off the religious right. That's an important part of the general
welfare. g

Then hanging the more egregious Liberals like pinatas from lamp posts
would also qualify.


Please be specific.

That was specific.

BTW, the Army's been active for more than two years now. Under the
Constitution, time's up.

The vote for the next two years funding was done. Hence, its
constitutional.

Gunner


Rule #35
"That which does not kill you,
has made a huge tactical error"