On 5 Apr 2005 10:37:46 -0700, jim rozen
wrote:

In article , Gunner says...

Chuckle...Jim? The Judicial Activism of the past 20 yrs has ****ed
off a lot of people...

Judicial Activism? You call defending the US constitution judical activism??

Jim...if that were the case..there wouldnt be any gun control laws.
Get serious.

The USSC denied cert on this thing. What are you going to do, abolish
the supreme court so the republicans can get their toys back?

Denied cert means they were not going to hear it. This means what in
regards to Judicial Activism?


You really do *not* care about the constitution, do you. You would
be perfectly happy if the ripped up the entire thing, as long as the
second amendment were left alone.

Really? If the rest of the Constituion were not there, there would be
no need for the 2nd to provide protection for them

Given that you are a a liberal..moaning about protecting the
Constitution is about as hypocritical as you can get.

Gunner, they got spanked. They *should* have gotten spanked for
what they did.

Jim

Like the Florida SCOTUS in the 2000 election? Or was that someone
that sounded like you bitching about Judicial Activism?

Snicker

Gunner

Rule #35
"That which does not kill you,
has made a huge tactical error"