On 2 Apr 2005 05:18:20 -0800, jim rozen
wrote:

In article , Gunner says...

Got any cites that no other similar accidents have occured on that
bridge? Just those where the driver had no cell phone will do.

I was only pointing out that the bridge is a known trouble spot.
You would think that somebody who was from the area would respect
that and hang up the phone.

Jim

So you are finally admiting that accidents occur on the bridge, even
without cell phones being involved?

So what makes you sure that the cell phone in this case was the
proximate cause of the accident?

Gunner

Rule #35
"That which does not kill you,
has made a huge tactical error"