In article ,
says...
Those were not the "primary stated reasons" for the war, as you continue to
falsely claim; rather, they were two reasons among many.

If you really believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you. Those other
reasons were barely mentioned afterthoughts until the first two didn't
pan out.

And neither one has
been "debunked" as you falsely claim: It's not proven that Iraq had no WMDs,
and they definitely *did* have ties to al Qaida and numerous other terror
organizations.

Well, you can't prove a negative, so I guess you're right there. But at
least you'll have to admit that the ones Rumsfeldt said we knew the
location of certainly haven't shown up.

And Iraq had no more ties to terrorists than any other Arab/Muslim
nation. Like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, for example.

--
Homo sapiens is a goal, not a description