On 11 Mar 2005 10:32:23 -0800, Charlie Self wrote:
Doug Miller states:

On my planet, Saddam is still a murderous tyrant. Has that notion
been
debunked on yours?

Nobody has even suggested Saddam Hussein was less than a murderous
tyrant. What others, and I, feel is that he was not a direct threat to
the U.S. at any time, not likely to become one in a rational time
frame, and thus was not worth the expenditure of life and treasure that
has been applied.

Right, because if it doesn't matter to the USA, it isn't worth doing,
is that it?