In article . 201, Nate Perkins wrote:
(Doug Miller) wrote in
news
In article . 201,
Nate Perkins wrote:
(Doug Miller) wrote in
. com:


The UN required that they be destroyed under UN supervision, in
order that the whole world would KNOW that they had been destroyed.
That did not happen, and thus it is NOT known what became of them.

That's a pretty weak reason to wage a preemptive war.

You just don't seem able to grasp the simple concept that there were
*other* reasons as well.

Really? Which debunked reason do you want to fall back on this time?

On my planet, Saddam is still a murderous tyrant. Has that notion been
debunked on yours?


--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)

Nobody ever left footprints in the sands of time by sitting on his butt.
And who wants to leave buttprints in the sands of time?