DIYbanter - View Single Post

In article . 201,
Nate Perkins wrote:
(Doug Miller) wrote in
om:

The UN required that they be destroyed under UN supervision, in
order that the whole world would KNOW that they had been destroyed.
That did not happen, and thus it is NOT known what became of them.

That's a pretty weak reason to wage a preemptive war.

You just don't seem able to grasp the simple concept that there were
*other* reasons as well.

Really? Which debunked reason do you want to fall back on this time?

It is quite possible to be strongly in favor of freedom, liberty, and
democracy -- but still be very opposed to the Iraq war. Last I checked,
patriotism is not synonymous with blind support for a stupid course of
action.

Come back when you figure that out.

Difficult to figure out such a vague position.

-----------------------
"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." -- G. Washington