The logic (or whatever) problem here is that it's not an absolute.
i.e. "invading" is not (necessarily) the wrong answer.

As a simple exercise in the above:
Invading Iraq, for which the justification now seems to have fallen
apart, (please spare us the line about "best intelligence at the
time"), was, mayhaps, not so wise.

Using the justifications the administration gives, i.e. WMD, NKorea
certainly seems to fit the bill a lot better.

See the difference - "invading" vs "invading Iraq"? That little
modifier ("Iraq") makes a world of difference.

Renata

On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:39:29 GMT, (Doug Miller)
wrote:
-snip-

But speaking of baffling logic... you seem to be suggesting that the President
did the wrong thing by invading Iraq, and he's doing the wrong thing by *not*
invading North Korea.