On 2 Mar 2005 12:07:54 -0800, jim rozen wrote:
In article , Ned Simmons
says...

Remind me again how a murderer who is a day short of 18 years is a
"child" please?

Take it up with the Supremes.

Rule one: When the court produces a decision that goes with
your ideology, bang the drum and holler as loud as you can
that you now have a "mandate."

I don't see anyone calling it a "mandate" other than those who
disagree with Bush, saying people on the right call it a mandate.

Rule two: if they decide against your world view, blubber
kick and scream that this is all wrong and as soon as you
can appoint a few more justices (in spite of the fact that
most of them are slightly to the right of Ghengis Khan at the
moment) you will *really* show them other fellers what-for!
And no way they were right, so the law shouldn't be changed
anyhow. Just 9 old geezers anyhow...

I also don't see any blubbering, kicking, or screaming. I disagree,
is all.