In article .com, "Charlie Self" wrote:
Doug Miller states:

But speaking of baffling logic... you seem to be suggesting that the
President
did the wrong thing by invading Iraq, and he's doing the wrong thing by
*not*
invading North Korea.

You do live in an "either/or" world, don't you?

As contrasted to the world in which you live, one in which no matter *what*
the President does, it's wrong?

I am not suggesting he did the wrong thing in invading Iraq. I am
stating it. I am making no presentation of what might be done with or
about NK.

Give me a break. If you're "making no presentation" WRT North Korea, then what
was your point in mentioning the invasion of Iraq in response to a discussion
of whether NK does, or does not, have nukes?

On a personal basis, I'd strongly suggest a sniper at about half a mile
to lift the top of the pipsqueak's head even further off his brain, but

I trust you're referring to Kim Jong Mentally Ill here...

--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)

Nobody ever left footprints in the sands of time by sitting on his butt.
And who wants to leave buttprints in the sands of time?