On 25 Feb 2005 11:53:10 -0800, wrote:

Dave Hinz wrote:
On 25 Feb 2005 08:43:20 -0800,
wrote:

...
And,
you miss the point of my post which is that even by your
standards of what is acceptable or not, that one sarin shell
is direct evidence that "no WMDs" is not an accurate statement.

Can you at least agree to that point,

Agreed. Can we also agree that when a person writes:
"No WMD in Iraq" that is shorthand for "No substantive
violations of the UN resolutions on Iraqi WMD."?

Not by any means. "No WMD" is an absolute, "We haven't found
much, and what we did find was test-fired so it's OK" are two
different things, Fred.