On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:41:21 -0500, Ed Huntress wrote:
"Dave Hinz" wrote in message
...

Gunner made a statement of fact. Jim sniped at him about his post. I
asked what was wrong with Gunner's post, and Jim didn't have a reason
other than that it's Gunner. What's _your_ problem with Gunner's post?

Watch a few hundred more exchanges like this, and you will know.

OK, let's word it this way. Gunner made a reasonable post, and Jim
took exception to it. I'm asking what the problem is.

Right now,
you don't have a clue, and I'm not going to recount several years worth of
discussions just to satisfy your sense of indignation.

It's obvious where the problem is. By the way, the lecture-tone doesn't
work with me.

If you don't want to sound like a deaf man shouting from inside a barrel,
listen first.

I've heard all I need to hear to know what the situation is. Jim doesn't
like Gunner. I was challenging his post where he was criticizing
Gunner's statement, because I wanted to know exactly what he thought
was false about Gunner's post.