"Dave Hinz" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:49:38 -0500, Ed Huntress
wrote:
"Dave Hinz" wrote in message
...
On 23 Feb 2005 10:01:41 -0800, jim rozen
wrote:
In article , Dave Hinz says...
The "situation" I'm talking about was the Rowan incident.
What about Gunner's statements about it,
I do not disagree with him on this particular issue.
But you just couldn't help but snipe at him. I see.
Dave, of all of the people here, Jim is among the most patient with
Gunner.
Watch the dynamic a little longer before being so quick to make
judgments.
Gunner made a statement of fact. Jim sniped at him about his post. I
asked what was wrong with Gunner's post, and Jim didn't have a reason
other than that it's Gunner. What's _your_ problem with Gunner's post?
Watch a few hundred more exchanges like this, and you will know. Right now,
you don't have a clue, and I'm not going to recount several years worth of
discussions just to satisfy your sense of indignation.
If you don't want to sound like a deaf man shouting from inside a barrel,
listen first.
--
Ed Huntress
|