In article , Dave Hinz says...

The numbers are black and white, Ed. If you think you can spend allocated
funds twice, then yes, there was a surplus during the Clinton years. Me,
I don't think that it works that way.

OK, now this is the part where you go on to say that gunner's
right, it's a really really good thing that the rate of debt
increase has gone up under bush's term. Or, that the second
derivative isn't really going up at all.

Jim


--
==================================================
please reply to:
JRR(zero) at pkmfgvm4 (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com
==================================================