Steve Scott wrote in message
news
It's not irrelevant when the OP (Nick in
this case) started the thread and header.

Completely irrelevant to this subthread.

It is his claim that humidification wastes energy.

Separate issue entirely to the specific claim being discussed
in this particular subthread, whether the claim that humidification
can save energy because the thermostat can be set lower is a lie.

If you had followed the sci.engr.heat-vent-ac
ng for any length of time you'd know that.

Completely irrelevant that specific claim being discussed.


On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:01:20 +1100, "Rod Speed"
wrote:


Edwin Pawlowski wrote in message
.com...
Rod Speed wrote
Gymmie Bob wrote

Most heating people have always claimed humidification
saves heating dollars. Maybe they don't mention the
dollars used to humidify in their formulae?...LOL

Anyway the point is moot.

Nope, not when discussing that claim it aint.

The header here says "wasted" energy.

Irrelevant when usenet threads often diverse past the original
subject header and no one bothers to change it for various reasons.


--
'If I could reach you, I would hurt
you, Pinky' -- The Brain