"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Cynic wrote:
Quite, all stuff I learnt well over 30 years ago. So why do you say I
was only "partially" correct? Which part do you believe I got wrong?
A "ferrite rod aerial" describes the ferrite *and* the coil BTW.

Ferrite rod aerials are irrelevant to UHF. Or even HF, if you look at the
average radio which includes SW.

You might also think about other things that are capable of
concentrating the received field.

No - I think you should explain how the device in question might work?

--
*If we weren't meant to eat animals, why are they made of meat?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

I emailed the Bad Science columnist on the Guardian,
he replied only with reference to dodgey PCR / DNA
technology not the subject of my mailing.
He takes pleasure in exposing dodgey devices etc
that rely on unproven technology and dodgey science.
Nothing in his piece yesterday exposing the Guardian item.
I somehow don't expect to see any write-up in the
Guardian about it.

What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles
and what Special Branch don't want you to know.
http://www.nutteing2.freeservers.com/dnapr.htm
or nutteingd in a search engine

Valid email (remove 4 of the 5 dots)
Ignore any other apparent em address used to post this message -
it is defunct due to spam.