View Single Post
  #14   Report Post  
Jim Levie
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 14:39:57 -0800, Jim Stewart wrote:

I think that you've oversimplifed the situation. I don't
think you will find much difference in lifetimes between
a semiconductor running at 20 deg C and one running at
80 deg C. Not today with modern parts. As long as the
part is working with within it's current and voltage
safe operating area and within it's temperature range,
you should not expect more failures than if it were
running at 20 deg C.

As far as I know the characteristics of materials hasn't recently,
although manufacturing processes have. Modern parts are better but the
effects of temperature on material migration is solely a materials
property. Testing that I was involved in some 15 years ago showed
measureable changes in device characteristics after relatively short runs
at the upper limit for a number of devices. Extrapolating that out results
in the prediction of earlier failure as compared to the same device
running at the lower end of the temperature range.

I used to have a number of papers from other studies done on a wide
variety of devices that supports what physics says should happen.

That's not to say that the manufacture's data is wrong. Many devices have
a published lifetime vs temperature spec and on average those devices will
run according to that curve. But that wasn't the question the OP asked.

--
The instructions said to use Windows 98 or better, so I installed RedHat.