Doug Winterburn wrote:


And he has the disctinction of having the highest percentage of votes
cast against a sitting President in history. Not to mention a war pres.


Making false statements won't justify your inability to accept the
outcome. Unlike his predecessor who had over 50% of the voters vote
against him in both of his victories, at least Bush had less than 50% vote
against him in his re-election.

To give the benefit of the doubt, he used the wrong term. Bush II
obviously did not have the largest "percentage" cast against him. What
he DID have was the largest actual number of votes cast against a
sitting Pres.

Another fact not likely to have appeared on Fox.