Doug Miller wrote:

: The First Amendment specifically prohibits Congress from enacting laws that
: abridge freedom of speech or of the press. They did just that last year. The
: Court ruled that they didn't.

: My point is: what do you do, what *can* you do, when the Court simply
: *ignores* the plain language of the Constitution and makes whatever ruling it
: damn pleases?


Hmmm. Where in the dictionary does it list a definition of the word
speech that defines it as "the act of making enormous cash contributions
to a political candidate by a corporation or union"? Can't seem to find
one that looks much like that.


-- Andy Barss