According to SpamFree :
"Terry" wrote:

I realize that you're Canadian and have a patriotic reason for
asserting the superiority of the Canadian Electrical Code however I
have an equally patriotic reason for asserting the opposite. In fact,
what Canada does wiring-wise has IMO as much relevance as the
electrical code of ... oh, say Bulgaria g. Canada doesn't allow AC?
Well that's nice to know. They probably do have special problems
wiring igloos g.

That's a stupid comment!
About equivalent to saying "Yeah they use lighted palm frond torches in
Florida or Hawaii"!
A reason for quoting the Canadian code was probably merely to point out
"Here is an authority not unknown for good safety practices in many
technical fields that regulates to the following standard."

I'm sorry, I took (and have taken over the years) it to mean, "Hey,
you dumb Americans. Wake up and learn what we Canadians, the smartest
people in the world when it comes to electrical codes, mandate for our
electrical installations. Just follow our lead and you'll be alright;
second-best maybe but OK."

That entire interpretation was silly when you consider I had also posted
a long discussion on how Canada is slowly adopting American style rules
for GFCIs in kitchens.

As Terry suggests, it was merely given as an example of an equally competent
electrical authority having reasons for and choosing not to go the
"use armor as ground" route.

I only know of one thing the Canadians have to teach us and that's how
to set up a single payer health care system but then again most
countries of the developed world, probably even Bulgaria, could teach
us something about health care systems.

Igloo construction too, perhaps g.

The US govt. and construction industry is rather fond of our R2000
construction methodology and quote/reference it a lot.

But they're not igloos.
--
Chris Lewis, Una confibula non set est
It's not just anyone who gets a Starship Cruiser class named after them.