"Roger Shoaf" wrote in message
...

Were the testing methods used in Wood magazine flawed? Or was there
something wrong with the product?


Not being an expert in this field, I cannot say. But if the testing
"method" was flawed it seems that TBII would have done worse than TBIII
also. By glue testing standards definition though TBIII is Water Resistant
and not Water Proof. Franklyn chooses to use Water Proof on its label as a
description of the name of the standards test.
That said, I do believe TBIII to be an excellent product.