"Harold & Susan Vordos" wrote in message
...

Sadly, It's not a contest.

There's no reason to be sad - we're all friends here.

But seriously, I was just getting cheeky with you. It's a symptom of being
young (more cheekiness)


Harold, did you even read my first post within this thread?

Yes, I did, and it is for that reason that I am confused that you'd even
suggest that no one had suggested a proper method. Using your newly
acquired slang, I recognize that you, too, offered the same suggestion.
I
did so in clear, concise English. Your response (to Dave) was abrasive
and evasive enough to give me cause to discount it, which I did.

You're right. It was abrasive, and that was intentional. I have never
appreciated his tone so I get a bit moody when responding to him.

I'm not
keen on ****ing contests. I'm also not keen on cute catch words for
particular operations. There are readers here that may not be up to speed
on
slang terminology. I try to be clear, so anyone reading can properly
interpret good and useful information. I am not trying to impress
anyone
with my knowledge or my ability to be clever. YMMV.

I was certainly not trying to be cute or impress anyone. I find that it is
easier to use "clock" as opposed to "indicate". Unfortunately (although not
surprisingly), Robert S. has confirmed your position. As such, I am
compelled to use proper terminology in the future, within this forum.

Regards,

Robin