"Swingman" wrote in news:-OSdnSuyVvDoiX3cRVn-
:


"Brian" wrote in message

And what makes you think that any of these people were even thinking
about Monster Cable when they named their businesses? What evidence
supports that claim?

And more to the claim of MC, and reasons for trademarks ... how is
their
advertising going to benefit Monster Anything else?


Well it might not benefit most of the defendants, but it could pretty
easily benefit MOnster.com . While Monster.com is a very well known
website, it is not difficult to imagine that a number of consumers
looking for the monster cable site would simple type monster.com


That, IMO, should be the VERY basis for this type of frivolous, make-
work
for the legal profession.