On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 09:19:36 GMT, Roger
wrote:

The message
from Andy Hall contains these words:

The rest of Europe uses net calorific value and so if there is latent
heat contribution through condensing, efficiencies do go abover 100%.

Which of course is semantic nonsense and leads dumbos like dIMM to think
they are getting something for nothing.

Yes of course, because charging is related to the given calorific
value.

What you can say is that condensing captures the latent heat, plus in
general lower flue gas temperatures lead to less heat loss.





--

..andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl