Thread: Boiler cycling
View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
Andy Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 20:58:19 -0000, "Mike" wrote:


"Andy Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 20:16:35 -0000, "Mike" wrote:




Basically the flow rate is too low, as is the return temperature. You
have about 25 degrees temperature drop on a design that should be
about 12 degrees.

You don't say what pipe size your main 40m runs are,


Partially 28mm, but about 15m of flexible 22mm plastic was needed to poke
under a floor we couldn't get under properly. Did wonder at the time if I
might need to put in parallel runs of this pipe so there is a rope left to
allow more to be dragged through. However couldn't see a way of
parallelling these up without causing more resistance. Need a sort of Y
joint whereas all I could find were Ts or swept Ts.


You'd have to compare the resistance of adding the fittings vs. having
the extra pipe. Also, for the plastic section, you may need to ask
the manufacturer because characteristics may well be different to
copper.



or which model Alpha. Is it the larger one?


Yes



One relatively simple thing that you could try is to go and check all
the radiator lockshield valves and open them. If they are closed
down too low then this will restrict flow. Of course it may be that
some have to be quite a bit for balancing, but at least if you could
improve the flow it would help.


Two are flat out, rest are balanced to maintain all radiators at roughly the
same temperature drop.


If the others are closed almost down in an effort to get a reasonable
temperature drop across these two, it sould indicate inadequate
pipework for the size/distance of them.

You could look up the radiator manufacturer data for the radiators (or
ones close to them). There is not an enormous difference between
vendors for typical finned radiators. THe main effect is the number
of panels and which have fins. If you find something close in size,
you can scale it. This should give you a gross heat output assuming
the EN testing method. You then need to look at the derating table
for the mean water to air temperature correction factor. For 82
degree flow and 70 return, (MWTA about 55 degrees) the normal derating
is to multiply by 0.9. So if you determine by size that a radiator
has a nominal output of 1kW, its actual output under what should be
the design conditions for your system will be 900W. You can then
take that figure and plug it into the CDA method and just check that
the pipework to those two radiators is adequate for them. A rough
rule of thumb is that 15mm pipe should be good to carry 6kW over
distances of a few metres (but not 40 :-) ).

You could try opening up a few of the other radiators (note the
lockshield positions for setting back) and see if it makes much
difference to the flow and return temperature on the main return. If
it does then probably the focus should be inside the house. If not,
then probably the long pipe runs and you could need a more powerful
pump.


Beyond that, you could look through the design guide published by the
Copper Development Association and do the calculations for the pipe
runs.

http://www.cda.org.uk/Megab2/build/Pub150%20UKCB.pdf

If you plug in the numbers for the main pipe runs, that should give
some clue if there is something inadequate.


Thanks - will do. Sounds to be what I need.

It's slightly laborious but you don't have to be hugely accurate.

In effect, the system is adrift by a factor of 2:1, so it should be
possible to deduce what is going wrong. You can work back to
determine the pump requirement given the resistance and from that see
if it is within the range of the pump.




You can then work back and see if putting in a more powerful pump will
help (assuming that radiator tweaks don't)

--

.andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl




--

..andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl