"Andy Dingley" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:15:12 -0600, "Swingman" wrote:

Well, he does still have all his fingers,

This one doesn't appear to

http://www.msd.k12.mo.us/vocational/...sing%20-trelli
s(Ryan&Tars).JPG

Or... is his finger bent - like the second finger is?


Nasty kickback risk on this one, even with that riving knife.

http://www.msd.k12.mo.us/vocational/...SAWING%202.jpg

Oh please. You're stretching on this one Andy. Is there any cut on a table
saw that the kickback police don't nail as a kickback hazard? That is a
perfectly reasonable cut to make on a table saw.


The inverted sander isn't good practice

http://www.msd.k12.mo.us/vocational/...%20frames/Pix%
20frames%20ll%20(Ryan).jpg

Now that one is... shall we say... novel. Not a horrible safety risk since
it's just a vibrating sander, but I can't imagine how wobbly that must have
been.


This should have a push board to feed the board through - can't see if
there is one.

http://www.msd.k12.mo.us/vocational/woodworking/ww%205th%20hour%20class/R.Meridith(Bread%20board-sanding).JPG

I'd really be concerned if there was a push stick in the picture. Note that
the board is not yet past the edge of the bed. You'd suggest a push stick
on a board that is not fully secured on the bed? It's time to quit looking
for boogy men in everything on this site. His hands aren't near the
business end of the machine and his hands offer far better control than a
push stick. So - what is the safety advantage of a push stick?


--

-Mike-