Edwin Pawlowski wrote:


"J. Clarke" wrote in message


What "false dilemma"? If one has a saw equipped with a Sawstop, then the
choice is to replace the cartridge for 100 bucks, replace the saw for
whatever is the price of a new saw, defeat the absent cartridge, or don't
saw. I don't see another option.


That is the point he is making.

What is the point?

You'd happily pay $100 or more if it save
your finger from being amputated. Yes, you'd be very PO'd on a false
reaction, but I'd put $1000 in the till if it saves a finger.

Don't presume to tell me what I would do, sir.

IMO, the idea if fantastic and I'd be willing to pay a premium to have it
on
my saw. Just like airbags in a car and life vests on a boat. BUT . . .
yes, that is a BUT I want to see it as proven technology that it will save
my skin and not give false tripping.

Agreed. But it _is_ going to trigger under circumstances where no injury
would have occured.

--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)