J wrote:

"J. Clarke" wrote in message
...
Bob wrote:

Would you pay $100 for everytime Sawstop fired or misfired to replace
the parts?

If the choice was that or 1600 bucks for a new saw, then the answer is
obvious.

Why would that be the only choice? Do you buy a new saw when you have an
accident on it?

If the accident does $100 worth of damage to the saw then the choice is to
pay the $100 to fix it or to get a new saw. Same situation.

An equally valid choice would be pay $100 or have a peanut butter and
jelly sandwich rammed down your throat by a purple titanium robot while
you are sleeping.

How is that an "equally valid choice"? It makes absolutely no sense as an
analogy.

I hate false dilemmas.

What "false dilemma"? If one has a saw equipped with a Sawstop, then the
choice is to replace the cartridge for 100 bucks, replace the saw for
whatever is the price of a new saw, defeat the absent cartridge, or don't
saw. I don't see another option.

-j

--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)