On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 00:01:07 -0500, Hank Gillette
wrote:

In article ,
Dave Hinz wrote:

Yup. It's clear that Sawstop's motivation is for other than the public
good. Hell, one could argue that by patenting it and failing to provide
a product, they're _preventing_ public good, since they won't allow
competant manufacturers to build 'em.

He offered to license it to the manufacturers and they blew him off. How
is that not letting them build them?


that's his side of the story. we aready know that sawstop is ready to
play dirty to get their way.