On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 21:36:57 UTC, Tim S wrote:

Yes - that sounds better. I did wonder if "emptor" needed a different
declension until I realised that it's missing its declension
ending altogether (emptor-is)!! I only did latin for a year - can anyone
with a "proper educashun" explain that?

No, but I wonder why it isn't 'emptor caveat'....!

--
Bob Eager
begin a new life...dump Windows!