How can one tell if the tubings and the joints are the affected ones? Are
there markings on them?

Also, upon further reading on the settlement, the Canadian action was only
settled in the province of Ontario. Does anyone know if the other provinces
settled, especially in British Columbia?

--

remove 'nospam' for correct email address
"Michael Baugh" wrote in message
.. .
I believe that chlorinated water speeded the degradation, and you're not
using it in that piping. Could it be that the newer couplers were used in
your installation, and that you don't need to be awaiting a failure?
http://www.polypipe.com/polypipe/pp_...lumb/price.pdf
Also, may be that yours weren't made with resins produced by Mitsui
Plastrics, which product is being called Type M.

Don Lee wrote in message
news:akXpd.358129$nl.343990@pd7tw3no...
Seems like the Canadian action only covers for replacement and leaks
from
the acetal joints which apparantly are rare. There is really not much I
can
do about the infloor tubings since the only way to replace them would be
jack hammering the whole house !! Oxygen permeability seems to be the
biggest concern. Again, not much I can do about that until the boiler
leaks. I wonder if oxygen scavengers/rust inhibitors would help.

"Michael Baugh" wrote in message
...
U.S. version is at
http://www.kinsella.com/polybutylene/propset.shtml
and Canadian action is a variant on it
http://www.canadalawbook.ca/OAPCaseS...CWSJ3d690.html
If I were using it as part of a hot water recirculation system, I'd
have
some concerns. Even if it weren't delivering water of 180 degrees.

http://www.grassroots.ca/homeowner_h..._pipes_v2.html

Don Lee wrote in message
news:seTpd.360215$%k.143297@pd7tw2no...
My 14 yo house has polybutylene tubings running in the floor for
hydronic
heating. So far, there has not been any leaks attributed to them,
and
the
boiler is original. Any concerns? What is the outcome of the class
action
re. polybuts in Canada?

--

remove 'nospam' for correct email address