"Cliff" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 02:22:43 GMT, "Joe Halbleib"
wrote:


"Cliff" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 02:16:17 GMT, (The Watcher)
wrote:

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:10:08 -0500, Cliff wrote:

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 04:32:49 GMT, Gunner
wrote:

Something evidently you are totally unfamiliar with, basing
your posts on fear, paranoia and phobia and nothing else.

Tell us again why you *need* guns?

Tell us again why you think anybody needs to prove any "need" to YOU.

LMAO.


I'm not the one claiming any need BSEG.

WANT is enough, Cliff. No need is required. It's a right, not a
privilege
to be doled out.

Joe

So want is all you need to whine like a spoiled brat & shoot guns
(else you'll have a temper tantrum)?

I want to be afforded the full benefit of my 2nd Amendment. No whine. No
spoiled brat behavior. I just demand it and assume it.

Somehow I gathered that some things were a bit more important.

Why would they have needed an ammendment?

To make it extremely clear. Just in case some jerks in the future decide
that they would like to curtail gun ownership and free use.

How many other
"wants" do you have? Do they all need ammendments too, just
to make YOU happy? So that you can get your way?

I'll settle for the ones in the Constitution and in common law.

BTW, That's NOT what the 2nd says. Back to Jr. High with
you; you just failed government class.

Firstly Cliffie... Bite me! I didn't fail. You are a moron.

Second, I *DO* know what the Amendment says and have its correct
interpretation. It describes an individual right to keep and bear arms.
Rather than just saying you disagree, you have to insult me. You're a
sniveling little ****. Come talk to me that way to my face you jerk! Brave
on Usenet, huh?

regards,
Joe

--
Cliff