On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 13:30:28 -0500, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:

"The Watcher" wrote in message
...
)

True enough. What I'm talking about is the good sens of gun owners, not
of
anti-gunners.

Nope, you're talking about caving in to the demands of gun grabbers.

No, you don't get it. I didn't see YOU at the NJ statehouse lobbying like
hell against "assault rifle" bans, when I was there. I didn't see YOU
testifying at state senate hearings.

When we see what you've actually done, then maybe you can judge what I'm
"talking about." Until then, I know what I'm talking about, and you don't.

That's funny. I was referring to what you are talking about HERE, and what you
are talking about HERE is caving in to the demands of the gun grabbers because
you don't want to hurt their feelings. Personally, I say **** their feelings. If
they have problems with high-capacity magazines, black rifles, or anything else,
they can just get over it. It's not my problem. Their little neuroses(and
anybody else's neuroses) are their problems.