On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 13:07:22 -0500, "George Willer"
wrote:

(Moved newbie's reply to the bottom.)

"Cliff" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:45:35 GMT, Gunner
wrote:

Lets face it Ed..the 2nd Amendment is not about duck hunting. Its
about the ability to protect ones self, ones family and ones nation
for bad government and foreign enemies.

Those evil bad black guns are the Most protected of all firearms, as
they have military utility in doing exactly that.

Then your right to have nuclear bombs & poison gasses & biological
agents is even more so.
HTH

I rarely read Ed's posts any more, and am even less inclined to read
Cliff's.

Nobody can make you think, can they?

Both seem a little off balance to me, but they have no clue.

Got Nukes do you?

What was Gunner posting ABOUT? Did you read his posts?

Explain in your own words, please.

I just made an exception. The irony is that they and others post so
negatively about Gunner's posts... the best source of sanity on this
subject.

If guns make you safer then you have the least deaths by
gunfire when everyone is *very* well armed and it follows that
almost everyone will be killed or injured by gunfire when
nobody has any guns.

Gunner's good, right?
Did they check your sanity at the door?

This post of Cliff's is a perfect example of loony!

Probably got your hat.

George Willer
--
Cliff