"Cicero" wrote in message
. uk...
":::Jerry::::" wrote in message
...
"Cicero" wrote in message
. uk...
snip
and any other structure (suitable for a
domestic environment) would be no more secure in such conditions.
==============
Total bi**ocks, it's go nothing to do with a 'domestic environment', if
he
really needs a mast then he needs to use the correct structure.
============
Rubbish! He's building a structure in his back garden and no reasonable
person would build a grossly unsightly skyscraper with a hundred year life
expectancy when he can build something more aesthetically pleasing with a
shorter life span.
It's got nothing to do with the life span of any structure (and no one has
mentioned that aspect until now) [1], it has everything to do with any mast
being able to do what it asked of it safely.
[1] life span is solely an economics issue.
snip the rest of 'Cicero' rant:
|