"Andy Hall" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:52:15 -0000, ":::Jerry::::"
wrote:


But you are, when an organisation is larger than the British army how
are
not going to have privately run megaliths, and don't just say split it
up
as
that would just increase the problems (both from an organisational PoV
but
also for the patients).

Successive governments have allowed the NHS to grow like topsy into
the mess it is today.

Once you get past the assumption that one needs to have a centrally
run system, it all becomes much simpler.

Private sector healthcare providers would compete for the best medical
staff and the best but minimal administration. Natural selection
would result in the incompetent being left out of the equation.


Like it does (not) in the USA you mean....

No I don't mean.

Yes it is, as I said, find out the facts, you are in effect suggesting that
we go over to a system of medical insurance funded health care.



As I've said, go and find out the fact, or even half the facts before
spouting your far right-wing clap.

It is certainly not far right wing - simply thinking outside the
preconceived notion that the state should deliver health care.
The only need is the financial provision.


Well, suggesting the destruction of a working health system that treats on
need, rich or poor, is certainly the thinking of the far right - heck, even
Maggie blocked those suggestion, and they were thought about by some of her
(lets say) more nutty 'advisers'.