"Andy Hall" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:23:19 -0000, "IMM" wrote:


"Andy Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 01:01:09 -0000, "IMM" wrote:


"Andy Hall" wrote in message


Not at all, although I do object to paying tax to support an
arrangement that belongs in the 1940s.

Have people grown two heads since then?

Most people haven't but perhaps Zaphod Beeblebrox is an aquaintance of
yours.

The notion of universal state run healthcare, free at the point of
delivery is a nonsense in the 21st century.

Have people changed sonce the 20th century, grown another leg as well?

The mix of health issues has changed considerably over the last 60
years.

With
the technology we have today to reduce manpower and make matters more
efficient, it makes even more sense to care for the sick.

I didn't say that it doesn't. I simply don't believe that the
government needs to be involved in its delivery. Come to think of it,
the government doesn't need to be involved in very much at all.

Just providing a force of men to keep the status quo which means the rich
stay rich. How naive.