View Single Post
  #177   Report Post  
Andy Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 15:33:13 -0000, ":::Jerry::::"
wrote:


"Andy Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:29:08 -0000, ":::Jerry::::"
wrote:


"Andy Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 10:33:44 -0000, ":::Jerry::::"
wrote:


"Andy Hall" wrote in message


That could very easily be made more competitive by means of trading
disposal credits,

No, all you are doing is creating yet another bureaucratic machine,

how
can
you swap providers other than laying new pipe ?!


It's perfectly simple. There is competition in the electricity and
gas supply industries which is achieved perfectly well without the
need for additional cable and pipework infrastucture.
snip more far right wing ignorance

That is NOT competition, it's a private MONOPOLY / cartel.

So please explain the broad price spread between suppliers.


Most are not suppliers, they are billing companies, as they certainly don't
supply the product.

If I buy the product from them they are the supplier. They may wish
to subcontract, but that is their affair. There is, nevertheless, a
choice, even though the saving is based on ability to trade and
minimise administration.



--

..andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl