Doug Miller wrote:

Did you see the part about it possibly being a hoax?

Yuppers. It pretty much goes without saying that any statement or
claim relating to politics shouldn't be taken too seriously
without verification (which I, of course, can't provide.)

Nevertheless, I did find it interesting - and think it would be
/very/ much more interesting if it could be verified.

Even if totally true, however, I'd still not be overwhelmingly
convinced that it's meaningful (strong correlations frequently
aren't.)

--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto, Iowa USA